Excerpts from the Chicago Tribune:
The group representing firefighters and municipalities is pushing to reintroduce a law that shields first responders—police officers, firefighters, and EMS personnel—from being sued when they try to assist individuals in need. Known as the public duty rule, this law dates back to the 1800s and provided firefighters and paramedics with broad immunity from lawsuits related to their work.
However, earlier this year, the Illinois Supreme Court overturned this rule in a case involving the 2008 death of a 58-year-old Will County woman who called 911 during a cardiac arrest episode. Paramedics arrived but hesitated to enter her home without police presence, leading to a delay in emergency care. Her family subsequently filed a lawsuit, which was initially dismissed but later appealed to the state's highest court.
The court sent the case back to the lower court, stating that the public duty rule was both confusing and misapplied. While another law, tort immunity, offers similar protection to emergency personnel, it doesn't cover cases of willful or wanton misconduct. Both the Illinois Municipal League and the Associated Firefighters of Illinois are concerned that the absence of the public duty rule could lead to costly frivolous lawsuits for municipalities and, ultimately, taxpayers.
A bill proposed in the Illinois Senate aims to restore the public duty rule, although it hasn't yet been discussed in committee. Brad Cole, the executive director of the Illinois Municipal League, emphasized that this law ensures first responders can focus on their duties without the stress of potential lawsuits. He stated that the public duty rule has been standard practice for 160 years and isn't introducing anything new.
Chris Hurley, the president-elect of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, which opposes the bill, argued that the public duty law unjustly protected public safety employees from facing consequences for misconduct. He believes that eliminating this rule removes unnecessary confusion in case law and doesn't harm local governments or their workers.
Meanwhile, the Illinois Municipal League and the firefighters' union are urging the legislature to act quickly. Perry Browder, the president of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, countered that the proposed legislation is too broad and could undermine accountability for public safety agencies, potentially encouraging reckless behavior.
This debate highlights the ongoing tension between protecting first responders and ensuring accountability for their actions. As discussions continue, the future of the public duty rule remains uncertain.
Excerpts from Pantograph:
An Illinois Supreme Court decision has brought together two typically opposing groups at the state legislature. The Illinois Municipal League and the Associated Fire Fighters of Illinois, the largest firefighters' union in the state, are jointly supporting a bill aimed at shielding local governments and public safety personnel from litigation over how they handle service prioritization.
Sponsored by Senator James Clayborne, the bill seeks to reinstate the public duty rule abolished by the Supreme Court in January. This rule previously ensured that governmental units and their employees were responsible for the welfare of the general public rather than specific individuals.
The court's decision came in response to a case involving the 2008 death of Coretta Coleman. Despite multiple delays and miscommunications, over 40 minutes passed before paramedics were allowed entry to Coleman's home by her husband. She was later declared unresponsive and died at the hospital. Her family sued several entities involved in the emergency response, but lower courts dismissed the case citing the public duty rule. The Supreme Court, however, overturned this decision in a 4-3 vote.
Brad Cole, the Municipal League's executive director, described the court's move as "dangerous," arguing that it could expose local governments to litigation over service prioritization. Although no immediate surge in lawsuits has occurred post-ruling, the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association opposes the bill.
Perry Browder, the association's president, expressed concerns about the bill's broad scope, fearing it might hinder necessary checks on public safety operations. He emphasized the importance of balancing the prevention of frivolous lawsuits with maintaining standards of responsible conduct among public safety personnel.
This legislative push reflects a complex interplay of legal principles and practical considerations, highlighting ongoing challenges in balancing public safety and legal accountability.
Tyre Rack,Tyre Storage Rack,The Tyre Rack,Tyre Display Rack
Nanjing Chinylion Metal Products Co., Ltd , https://www.clrack.com